← Back to all lessons
Class 10Algebra31:03Published 4 May 2024

Real Numbers: Important Questions Part 2 (Class X)

A second set of worked CBSE Class 10 Real Numbers questions, covering LCM and HCF by prime factorization, why certain numbers can never end in zero, spotting composite numbers, proofs that surds like the square root of two are irrational, and two word problems on HCF and LCM.

This lesson continues the Real Numbers chapter with more important exam questions for Class 10. It uses prime factorization to find LCM and HCF, argues why powers such as four to the n and six to the n never end in zero, and shows how to recognise composite numbers by factoring. It then proves several surds are irrational using the contradiction method, and finishes with two word problems solved with HCF and LCM.

What you'll learn

  • How to find the LCM and HCF of two numbers using prime factorization
  • Why powers like four to the n and six to the n can never end in the digit zero
  • How to show an expression is composite by taking out a common factor
  • How to prove a surd is irrational using proof by contradiction, and where it applies in word problems

Lesson chapters

0:00Introduction
0:24LCM and HCF of 15 and 21 by prime factorization
2:36Why four to the n never ends in zero
4:42Why six to the n never ends in zero
8:04Showing expressions are composite numbers
14:06Proving the square root of two is irrational
20:09More irrationality proofs
23:14Word problem: stacking with HCF
27:11Word problem: meeting again with LCM

Lesson notes

This is the second set of important questions on Real Numbers for Class 10. It covers LCM and HCF by prime factorization, why certain powers never end in zero, recognising composite numbers, proving surds are irrational, and two word problems.

LCM and HCF of 15 and 21

Factorize each number into primes: 15=3×5,21=3×715 = 3 \times 5, \qquad 21 = 3 \times 7

The HCF is the product of the common prime factors, and the LCM is the product of the highest powers of all primes that appear: HCF=3,LCM=3×5×7=105\text{HCF} = 3, \qquad \text{LCM} = 3 \times 5 \times 7 = 105

A true or false on the product of three numbers

The statement to judge is: for any three numbers, their product equals the product of their HCF and LCM. For two numbers aa and bb the identity a×b=HCF(a,b)×LCM(a,b)a \times b = \text{HCF}(a,b) \times \text{LCM}(a,b) does hold. However, this identity does not extend to three numbers: in general a×b×cHCF(a,b,c)×LCM(a,b,c)a \times b \times c \neq \text{HCF}(a,b,c) \times \text{LCM}(a,b,c). For example, take a=2a = 2, b=3b = 3, c=4c = 4. Then a×b×c=24a \times b \times c = 24, while HCF(2,3,4)=1\text{HCF}(2,3,4) = 1 and LCM(2,3,4)=12\text{LCM}(2,3,4) = 12, so HCF×LCM=1224\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = 12 \neq 24. Since the proposed identity fails for three numbers, the statement is false.

Why 4n4^n never ends in zero

A number ends in 00 only if it is divisible by 10=2×510 = 2 \times 5, that is, only if its prime factorization contains a 55. But 4n=(22)n=22n,4^n = (2^2)^n = 2^{2n}, which contains no factor of 55. So 4n4^n never ends in the digit 00 for any natural number nn.

Why 6n6^n never ends in zero

The same idea applies. If 6n6^n ended in 00 it would be divisible by 55, so a 55 would appear in its prime factorization. But 6n=(2×3)n=2n×3n,6^n = (2 \times 3)^n = 2^n \times 3^n, which has no factor of 55. Therefore 6n6^n does not end in 00 for any natural number nn.

Showing expressions are composite

A number is composite if it can be written as a product of primes (other than itself and 11). The trick is to take out a common factor.

First expression. 7×11×13+13=13(7×11+1)=13×78=13×(2×3×13)=2×3×1327 \times 11 \times 13 + 13 = 13\,(7 \times 11 + 1) = 13 \times 78 = 13 \times (2 \times 3 \times 13) = 2 \times 3 \times 13^2 This is a product of primes, so the number is composite.

Second expression. Here 7×6×5×4×3×2×1=7!=50407 \times 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 7! = 5040, so 7!+5=5(7×6×4×3×2×1+1)=5×10097! + 5 = 5\,(7 \times 6 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 + 1) = 5 \times 1009 Since 55 is a factor, the number has a divisor other than 11 and itself, so it is composite.

Proving 2\sqrt{2} is irrational

We use proof by contradiction. Assume 2\sqrt{2} is rational, so it can be written as 2=ab\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b} where aa and bb are co-prime integers with b0b \neq 0.

Squaring and rearranging: 2=a2b2    a2=2b22 = \frac{a^2}{b^2} \implies a^2 = 2b^2

So 22 divides a2a^2, and by the theorem that if a prime pp divides a2a^2 then pp divides aa, we get that 22 divides aa. Write a=2ca = 2c. Substituting back: 2b2=(2c)2=4c2    b2=2c22b^2 = (2c)^2 = 4c^2 \implies b^2 = 2c^2

So 22 divides b2b^2, and hence 22 divides bb. Now 22 is a common factor of both aa and bb, which contradicts the assumption that they are co-prime. Therefore the assumption is wrong and 2\sqrt{2} is irrational.

More irrationality proofs

3\sqrt{3} is irrational. By the same argument, assume 3=ab\sqrt{3} = \tfrac{a}{b} with a,ba, b co-prime. Then 3b2=a23b^2 = a^2, so 33 divides aa; writing a=3ca = 3c gives b2=3c2b^2 = 3c^2, so 33 divides bb. The shared factor 33 contradicts co-primeness, so 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

12\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is irrational. Rationalize: 12=12×22=22\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \times \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} If this were rational, then 2=2×12\sqrt{2} = 2 \times \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} would be rational too. But 2\sqrt{2} is irrational, a contradiction, so 12\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is irrational.

6+26 + \sqrt{2} is irrational. Assume it is rational and equals ab\tfrac{a}{b}. Then 2=ab6=a6bb,\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b} - 6 = \frac{a - 6b}{b}, which would make 2\sqrt{2} rational. That contradicts the irrationality of 2\sqrt{2}, so 6+26 + \sqrt{2} is irrational.

2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational. Assume it is rational. Squaring: (2+3)2=2+26+3=5+26(\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3})^2 = 2 + 2\sqrt{6} + 3 = 5 + 2\sqrt{6} If 5+26=ab5 + 2\sqrt{6} = \tfrac{a}{b}, then 6=a5b2b,\sqrt{6} = \frac{a - 5b}{2b}, which would be rational. Since 6\sqrt{6} is irrational, this is a contradiction, so 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational.

Word problem: stacking with HCF

A sweet stall has 420420 kaju barfis and 130130 badam barfis, to be stacked so each stack holds the same number and the number of stacks is the least possible. The number to put in each stack is the HCF of 420420 and 130130.

420=22×3×5×7,130=2×5×13420 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7, \qquad 130 = 2 \times 5 \times 13

The HCF takes the common primes to their lowest powers: HCF=2×5=10\text{HCF} = 2 \times 5 = 10

So each stack holds 1010 barfis.

Word problem: meeting again with LCM

Two people start together at the same point of a circular field and go the same way. One takes 1818 minutes per round and the other takes 1212 minutes. They next meet at the start after the LCM of the two times.

12=22×3,18=2×3212 = 2^2 \times 3, \qquad 18 = 2 \times 3^2

The LCM takes the highest power of each prime: LCM=22×32=4×9=36\text{LCM} = 2^2 \times 3^2 = 4 \times 9 = 36

So they meet again at the starting point after 3636 minutes.

Key takeaways

  • The HCF uses the lowest powers of the common primes and the LCM uses the highest powers of all primes; for two numbers their product equals HCF times LCM.
  • A number can end in 00 only if a factor of 55 appears in its prime factorization, so powers like 4n4^n and 6n6^n never do.
  • To prove a surd is irrational, assume it is a fraction in lowest terms and derive a shared factor, contradicting co-primeness.